• Synchronet Control Panel

    From The Millionaire@VERT to All on Sunday, January 12, 2020 19:17:24
    Does the Synchronet Control Panel look the same in Linux as it does in Windows or is it designed differently? Can someone post a screenshot please? Thanks.

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to The Millionaire on Monday, January 13, 2020 00:14:39
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to All on Sun Jan 12 2020 07:17 pm

    Does the Synchronet Control Panel look the same in Linux as it does in Windows or is it designed differently? Can someone post a screenshot please?

    There isn't a "Synchronet Control Panel" for Linux. The closest thing would be the gtkmonitor project - and yes, it looks different than the Synchronet Control Panel (which is only designed/built for Windows).

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #53:
    PETSCII = PET Standard Code of Information Interchange (a.k.a. CBM ASCII) Norco, CA WX: 47.0øF, 91.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nelgin@VERT/EOTLBBS to The Millionaire on Monday, January 13, 2020 10:27:44
    The wrote:
    Does the Synchronet Control Panel look the same in Linux as it does in Windows
    or is it designed differently? Can someone post a screenshot please? Thanks.


    Windows are for people who can't remember command lines :)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Nelgin on Monday, January 13, 2020 11:48:59
    The wrote:

    Windows are for people who can't remember command lines :)

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com



    But you can use command lines in the command prompt window. :-P

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Marisag@VERT/AMIGAC to The Millionaire on Monday, January 13, 2020 17:28:53
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to All on Sun Jan 12 2020 19:17:24

    Does the Synchronet Control Panel look the same in Linux as it does in Windows or is it designed differently? Can someone post a screenshot please?

    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same thing...

    Marisa
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/OurServers - A list of all our websites
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/HostSplash - SBBS hosting for $14/month
    þ Synchronet þ Amiga City - The BBS for the Amiga - more than 3,500+ files
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Marisag on Monday, January 13, 2020 18:46:55
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Marisag to The Millionaire on Mon Jan 13 2020 05:28 pm

    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same thing...

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long time..

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to Nightfox on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 06:12:20
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Marisag on Mon Jan 13 2020 18:46:55


    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows
    version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same
    thing...

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long time..

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine? ;)


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Nelgin@VERT/EOTLBBS to Rampage on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:44:01
    Rampage wrote:
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Marisag on Mon Jan 13 2020 18:46:55


    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows
    version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same
    thing...

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long time..

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine? ;)

    umonitor works just fine.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
  • From Grease@VERT/DARKMATT to Rampage on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 11:22:20
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Rampage to Nightfox on Tue Jan 14 2020 06:12 am

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine? ;)

    Which would be umonitor?

    Grease
    darkmatt.synchro.net

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ DARK MATTER BBS <<*>> darkmatt.synchro.net <<*>> Howdy, Y'all!
  • From Gamgee@VERT/PALANT to Rampage on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 09:59:00
    Rampage wrote to Nightfox <=-

    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows
    version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same
    thing...

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long time..

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a
    server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine?
    ;)

    Like..... /sbbs/exec/umonitor :-)



    ... To err is human, to forgive is against SysOp policy.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Grease on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 09:48:01
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Grease to Rampage on Tue Jan 14 2020 11:22 am

    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Rampage to Nightfox on Tue Jan 14 2020 06:12 am

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine? ;)

    Which would be umonitor?

    http://wiki.synchro.net/monitor:umonitor

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #17:
    David St. Hubbins: It's such a fine line between stupid, and uh... and clever. Norco, CA WX: 53.3øF, 85.0% humidity, 0 mph W wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Grease@VERT/DARKMATT to Digital Man on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 13:33:50
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Grease on Tue Jan 14 2020 09:48 am

    Which would be umonitor?
    http://wiki.synchro.net/monitor:umonitor

    Sorry, was a rhetorical statement. Was not asking what actually
    was umonitor.

    Grease
    darkmatt.synchro.net



    ... I say we nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ DARK MATTER BBS <<*>> darkmatt.synchro.net <<*>> Howdy, Y'all!
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Rampage on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 11:11:03
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Rampage to Nightfox on Tue Jan 14 2020 06:12 am

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long
    time..

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine? ;)

    I figured that might be why, though I was curious to see if Marisa's was an ASCII-based monitor.

    I have Linux on my 'server' machine (which runs Plex and a VM for my BBS), though I opted to have a GUI on it.. I installed Linux Mint with the Xfce GUI, which is a lightweight GUI - I know it adds more overhead, but the machine works fine and it has plenty of RAM for what I use it for.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Jeff Smith@VERT to The Millionaire on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 13:20:16
    Hello Millionaire,

    Does the Synchronet Control Panel look the same in Linux as it does in Windows
    or is it designed differently? Can someone post a screenshot please? Thanks.

    Not that I am aware of. The only CP that I am aware of is the one for the windows version of Synchronet.

    Would be nice to have a CP for us Linux users.

    Jeff

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4
    * Origin: Fidonet: The Ouija Board - Anoka, MN - bbs.ouijabrd.net (1:282/1031)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Gamgee@VERT to Jeff Smith on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 15:38:00
    Jeff Smith wrote to The Millionaire <=-

    Does the Synchronet Control Panel look the same in Linux as it does in Windows
    or is it designed differently? Can someone post a screenshot please? Thanks.

    Not that I am aware of. The only CP that I am aware of is the one
    for the windows version of Synchronet.

    Would be nice to have a CP for us Linux users.

    Try /sbbs/exec/umonitor



    ... Press any key to continue or any other key to quit
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Jeff Smith on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 15:02:04
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Jeff Smith to The Millionaire on Tue Jan 14 2020 01:20 pm

    Not that I am aware of. The only CP that I am aware of is the one for the windows version of Synchronet.

    For Linux, there's GTKMonitor..

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Marisag@VERT/AMIGAC to Nightfox on Wednesday, January 15, 2020 21:44:11
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Marisag on Mon Jan 13 2020 18:46:55

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long time..

    Yes, but requires a X connection to the BBS's server, and X on that server as well. My control panel is purely text based and works fine over a ssh connection to a non-GUI hosted server...

    Marisa
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/OurServers - A list of all our websites
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/HostSplash - SBBS hosting for $14/month
    þ Synchronet þ Amiga City - The BBS for the Amiga - more than 3,500+ files
  • From Ragnarok@VERT/DOCKSUD to Rampage on Monday, January 20, 2020 13:45:43
    El 14/1/20 a las 08:12, Rampage escribi¢:
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Marisag on Mon Jan 13 2020 18:46:55


    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows
    version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same
    thing...

    Why not use gtkmonitor? gtkmonitor has been around for a long time..

    probably because that requires a GUI... why require a GUI on a server when an ASCII-based monitor package would work just fine? ;)

    umonitor can be fine too in a screen session.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Dock Sud BBS TLD 24 HS - bbs.docksud.com.ar
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Digital Man on Monday, January 20, 2020 21:06:55
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Grease to Rampage on Tue Jan 14 2020 11:22 am

    http://wiki.synchro.net/monitor:umonitor

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #17:
    David St. Hubbins: It's such a fine line between stupid, and uh... and clever. Norco, CA WX: 53.3øF, 85.0% humidity, 0 mph W wind, 0.01 inches rain/24hrs


    It looks kinda similar to the dos based bbses wfc screen from the olden days. Very basically designed.

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Digital Man on Sunday, January 26, 2020 20:07:38
    It looks kinda similar to the dos based bbses wfc screen from the olden days. Very basically designed.




    Linux uses a DOS based kinda system anyways, so that would be about right I guess.

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to The Millionaire on Monday, January 27, 2020 11:36:22
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Sun Jan 26 2020 08:07 pm

    Linux uses a DOS based kinda system anyways, so that would be about right I guess.

    I'm not sure what you mean by "DOS based kinda system".. And Linux is significantly different behind the scenes than DOS. You couldn't just take a DOS program and run it on Linux - You'd need DOSEmu or some other emulator.

    I've heard of people getting Synchronet to work on Raspberry Pi systems, but it would require rebuilding Synchronet on it. And from what I've heard, I don't think you'd be able to run DOS doors on it.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to The Millionaire on Monday, January 27, 2020 16:50:37
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Sun Jan 26 2020 20:07:38

    Linux uses a DOS based kinda system anyways, so that would be about right I
    guess.

    No.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From Denn@VERT/OUTWEST to Nightfox on Monday, January 27, 2020 23:38:32
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to The Millionaire on Mon Jan 27 2020 11:36 am

    I've heard of people getting Synchronet to work on Raspberry Pi systems, but it would require rebuilding Synchronet on it. And from what I've heard, I don't think you'd be able to run DOS doors on it.

    I have made a raspian iso with Synchronet 3.17 and Mystic pre installed.
    and I believe there is a DOS emulator for the raspberry PI so it might be able to run DOS doors, I havent tried that, it does have the synchronet DOORs though.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ outwestbbs.com - the Outwest BBS
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Denn on Tuesday, January 28, 2020 10:47:12
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Denn to Nightfox on Mon Jan 27 2020 11:38 pm

    I have made a raspian iso with Synchronet 3.17 and Mystic pre installed. and I believe there is a DOS emulator for the raspberry PI so it might be able to run DOS doors, I havent tried that, it does have the synchronet DOORs though.

    I seem to remember hearing from others that there are problems running DOS doors on Raspberry Pi systems. The main issue is that it has to not only emulate DOS, but it also has to emulate an x86 processor. When the system already has an x86 processor, it's easier to do.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Oli@VERT to Nightfox on Tuesday, January 28, 2020 20:47:15
    I seem to remember hearing from others that there are problems
    running DOS doors on Raspberry Pi systems. The main issue is
    that it has to not only emulate DOS, but it also has to emulate
    an x86 processor. When the system already has an x86 processor,
    it's easier to do.

    I did run some old BBS soft in Dosbox on a Pi without any problems (biggest problem was to remember the DOS commands and configuring dosbox). It was just a
    brief test though and I have no idea how to setup a door in a dosbox executed within a unix bbs. x86 emulation on an ARM cpu doesn't seem to be a problem and
    should be fast enough for most BBS doors.

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: kakistocracy (2:280/464.47)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Oli on Tuesday, January 28, 2020 13:43:27
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Oli to Nightfox on Tue Jan 28 2020 08:47 pm

    I seem to remember hearing from others that there are problems
    running DOS doors on Raspberry Pi systems. The main issue is
    that it has to not only emulate DOS, but it also has to emulate
    an x86 processor. When the system already has an x86 processor,
    it's easier to do.

    I did run some old BBS soft in Dosbox on a Pi without any problems (biggest problem was to remember the DOS commands and configuring dosbox). It was just a brief test though and I have no idea how to setup a door in a dosbox executed within a unix bbs. x86 emulation on an ARM cpu doesn't seem to be a problem and should be fast enough for most BBS doors.

    dosbox has known issues with multi-node/user doors (doesn't support DOS share.exe-type file/record locking). I don't think those issues have been addressed. That said, some single-node/user doors may run okay so long as the ownership of the virtual COM/UART can be passed between DOS programs within a single instance of dosbox. These are all big unknowns (for me).

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #8:
    Derek Smalls: Making a big thing out of it would have been a good idea.
    Norco, CA WX: 72.7øF, 32.0% humidity, 5 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to NIGHTFOX on Tuesday, January 28, 2020 18:16:00
    I'm not sure what you mean by "DOS based kinda system".. And Linux is signific
    ntly different behind the scenes than DOS. You couldn't just take a DOS progra
    and run it on Linux - You'd need DOSEmu or some other emulator.

    Maybe he means that you can have a cli driven system, like DOS was, without
    an X window system. You cannot really do that with Windows any more.


    * SLMR 2.1a * If all appears to go well, you missed something...

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Dumas Walker on Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:43:45
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Dumas Walker to NIGHTFOX on Tue Jan 28 2020 06:16 pm

    Maybe he means that you can have a cli driven system, like DOS was, without an X window system. You cannot really do that with Windows any more.

    I've seen server versions of Windows that don't have a GUI.. At least, not much of a GUI - I've seen ones that basically just let you open command prompt windows.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Tony Langdon@VERT to Oli on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 20:54:00
    On 01-28-20 20:47, Oli wrote to Nightfox <=-

    I did run some old BBS soft in Dosbox on a Pi without any problems (biggest problem was to remember the DOS commands and configuring
    dosbox). It was just a brief test though and I have no idea how to
    setup a door in a dosbox executed within a unix bbs. x86 emulation on
    an ARM cpu doesn't seem to be a problem and should be fast enough for
    most BBS doors.

    The only issue with DOSBox is it doesn't handle file locking, so only one user can run the door at the same time. :(


    ... MS-DOS=suit & tie, Macintosh=cool shades, Amiga=high heels & leather
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Dumas Walker on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:35:56
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Dumas Walker to NIGHTFOX on Tue Jan 28 2020 06:16 pm

    I'm not sure what you mean by "DOS based kinda system".. And Linux is signific
    ntly different behind the scenes than DOS. You couldn't just take a DOS progra
    and run it on Linux - You'd need DOSEmu or some other emulator.

    Maybe he means that you can have a cli driven system, like DOS was, without an X window system. You cannot really do that with Windows any more.

    Actually, I think you can: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Core

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #5:
    Nigel Tufnel: Authorities said... best leave it... unsolved.
    Norco, CA WX: 63.7øF, 33.0% humidity, 6 mph NNE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Denn on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 22:55:10
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Denn to Nightfox on Mon Jan 27 2020 23:38:32

    I have made a raspian iso with Synchronet 3.17 and Mystic pre installed. and I believe there is a DOS emulator for the raspberry PI so it might be able to run DOS doors, I havent tried
    that, it does have the synchronet DOORs though.

    You should be able to make either QEMU or DOSBOX work, though you won't be able to have any DOS doors in multi-user mode, it just won't work with either QEMU or DOSBOX (I guess you could use qemu if you did a network share on the pi, and then had each respective dos instance connect to that)... both are complex setups.

    Alternatively, you could setup an account for door party, and just defer to the remote service for your door usage.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Nightfox on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 22:59:10
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Dumas Walker on Tue Jan 28 2020 21:43:45

    I've seen server versions of Windows that don't have a GUI.. At least, not much of a GUI - I've seen ones that
    basically just let you open command prompt windows.

    There is a headless version of windows server that doesn't have a GUI, iirc, it's the basis of the windows containers... of course since windows desktops only support windows or linux containers in docker desktop, I've never actually tried anything other than a linux container for docker engine.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Tracker1 on Wednesday, January 29, 2020 16:44:39
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Nightfox on Wed Jan 29 2020 10:59 pm

    There is a headless version of windows server that doesn't have a GUI, iirc, it's the basis of the windows containers... of course since windows desktops only support windows or linux containers in docker desktop, I've never actually tried anything other than a linux container for docker engine.

    I didn't know Microsoft was using Docker. I knew Windows server versions have some built-in support for running VMs though. A long time ago, I heard Microsoft bought Virtual PC from Connectix, and I thought that's what Microsoft was using for their VM host software in Windows Server.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Alter Ego@VERT/ALTERANT to Nightfox on Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:42:40
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Tracker1 on Wed Jan 29 2020 04:44 pm

    I didn't know Microsoft was using Docker. I knew Windows server versions

    Yup, you can run docker on a lot of OSes.

    On linux, its native, on other OS's, under the covers it's linux on KVM (IIRC).

    I develop on a MAC using docker containers.

    https://www.docker.com/products/docker-desktop
    ...deon


    ... Ambition is the curse of the political class.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Alterant | an SBBS in Docker on Pi!
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Nightfox on Thursday, January 30, 2020 06:07:45
    There is a headless
    version of windows server that
    doesn't have a GUI,
    iirc, it's the basis of
    the windows containers... of
    course since
    windows desktops only
    support windows or linux
    containers in docker
    desktop, I've never
    actually tried anything other
    than a linux
    container for docker
    engine.

    I didn't know Microsoft was
    using Docker. I knew Windows
    server versions
    have some built-in support
    for running VMs though. A long
    time ago, I heard
    Microsoft bought Virtual PC
    from Connectix, and I thought
    that's what
    Microsoft was using for
    their VM host software in
    Windows Server.

    They use Hyper-V as their
    general hypervisor for
    virtualization. Windows server
    and Windows pro also can add
    support for Windows containers
    + docker. And there's
    experimental support for Linux
    containers with docker on
    Windows that's a more direct
    integration with Hyper-V.

    Docker desktop for Windows can
    do either Linux containers or
    Windows containers. It's
    actually running under the
    Windows hypervisor in a minimal
    vm, with some decent
    integration. But it's single
    user.

    There's also Windows subsystem
    for Linux 2 which can do a lot.

    I use docker desktop at work,
    where I'm Windows tethered.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Alter Ego on Thursday, January 30, 2020 06:11:57
    Yup, you can run docker on a
    lot of OSes.

    On linux, its native, on
    other OS's, under the covers
    it's linux on KVM
    (IIRC).

    I develop on a MAC using
    docker containers.


    https://www.docker.com/products
    /docker-desktop

    In Windows it's Hyper-V, in Mac
    they have something similar.

    Only thing to be aware of is
    volume mounts are not direct
    and best not to do a database
    with a desktop volume, it won't
    be pretty. It's actually doing
    an fs sync in Mac and Windows
    for desktop volumes.


    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Alter Ego@VERT/ALTERANT to Tracker1 on Thursday, January 30, 2020 19:18:54
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Alter Ego on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:11 am

    In Windows it's Hyper-V, in Mac
    they have something similar.

    Nope, Hyper-V is virtual machines, which is not docker containers.

    Only thing to be aware of is
    volume mounts are not direct
    and best not to do a database
    with a desktop volume, it won't
    be pretty. It's actually doing
    an fs sync in Mac and Windows
    for desktop volumes.

    I develop very heavy database I/O on MAC desktops and it works well. Not fast, I agree, but good enough for development.
    ...deon


    ... Young gorillas are friendly but they soon learn.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Alterant | an SBBS in Docker on Pi!
  • From Alter Ego@VERT/ALTERANT to Tracker1 on Thursday, January 30, 2020 19:33:30
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Alter Ego to Tracker1 on Thu Jan 30 2020 07:18 pm

    Nope, Hyper-V is virtual machines, which is not docker containers.

    Oh wait, I sit corrected.

    Looks like Hyper-V is used instead of KVM - sorry, I didnt see the link until I googled it (being curious)...
    ...deon


    ... I shot an arrow into the air, and it stuck.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Alterant | an SBBS in Docker on Pi!
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to echicken on Thursday, January 30, 2020 06:31:02
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Sun Jan 26 2020 20:07:38

    No.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com


    Yes because when Linus Torvaus(sp?) started developing Linux back in the mid 90's, he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a Linux kernel and built a windows GUI around it which became Linux. He also believed that the OS and its software shall always be free and be based on an open source community similar to Synchronet. By the way Linux was named after his name Linus since he started it all and has boomed over the years in a huge way. A lot of businesses rely on Linux as well.


    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From echicken@VERT/ECBBS to The Millionaire on Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:15:07
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:31:02

    Yes because when Linus Torvaus(sp?) started developing Linux back in the mid
    90's, he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a Linux kernel and built a
    windows GUI around it which became Linux. He also believed that the OS and its

    I don't think that's very accurate, but if you believe it then it explains your statement that "Linux uses a DOS based kinda system anyways", so okay.

    to Synchronet. By the way Linux was named after his name Linus since he started

    Wow really I never made that connection before wow that's really a good little factoid there good buddy thanks for sharing it really enlightened me hoo boy what a fun little tidbit I mean seriously wow.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Tracker1 on Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:06:45
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Nightfox on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:07 am

    They use Hyper-V as their
    general hypervisor for
    virtualization. Windows server
    and Windows pro also can add
    support for Windows containers
    + docker. And there's
    experimental support for Linux
    containers with docker on
    Windows that's a more direct
    integration with Hyper-V.

    Your message seems to be wrapped to a fairly narrow console width, around 30-something characters..

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to The Millionaire on Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:41:30
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:31 am

    Yes because when Linus Torvaus(sp?) started developing Linux back in the

    Torvalds

    mid 90's, he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a Linux

    It was actually the early 90s, and I heard he wanted to develop something similar to MINIX. I don't think it was due to any frustration with DOS.

    kernel and built a windows GUI around it which became Linux. He also

    I don't think Linux Torvalds was very involved in creating a GUI for Linux. As far as I know, the first GUI system for Linux was X-Windows, which started at MIT and developed by Jim Gettys and Bob Scheiffer.

    You should probably read up on the history of Linux..

    believed that the OS and its software shall always be free and be based on an open source community similar to Synchronet. By the way Linux was named after his name Linus since he started it all and has boomed over the years in a huge way. A lot of businesses rely on Linux as well.

    I think it's fairly well-known that Linux is named after Linus.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to echicken on Thursday, January 30, 2020 15:38:33
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:31:02

    I don't think that's very accurate, but if you believe it then it explains your statement that "Linux uses a DOS based kinda system anyways", so okay.

    Wow really I never made that connection before wow that's really a good little factoid there good buddy thanks for sharing it really enlightened me hoo boy what a fun little tidbit I mean seriously wow.

    ---
    echicken
    electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
    þ Synchronet þ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com


    Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Marisag on Thursday, January 30, 2020 15:40:01
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to All on Sun Jan 12 2020 19:17:24

    The Linux version doesn't have a control panel like the Windows version, which is why I wrote my own that does largely the same thing...

    Marisa
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/OurServers - A list of all our websites
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/HostSplash - SBBS hosting for $14/month
    þ Synchronet þ Amiga City - The BBS for the Amiga - more than 3,500+
    files


    Hey Marisa. Could you show me a screenshot?

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to The Millionaire on Thursday, January 30, 2020 15:59:37
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 03:38 pm

    2 random questions, 2 random answers:

    Which came first?

    Likely, the Big Bang.

    The chicken or the egg?

    I usually prefer chicken.


    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #19:
    The first Synchronet BBS (Vertrauen) went live in July of 1991 (replacing WWIV).
    Norco, CA WX: 72.7øF, 15.0% humidity, 6 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Marisag@VERT/AMIGAC to The Millionaire on Thursday, January 30, 2020 16:02:54
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to Marisag on Thu Jan 30 2020 15:40:01

    Hey Marisa. Could you show me a screenshot?

    Here is the sourceforge link where you can see it or download it...

    https://sourceforge.net/projects/synchronet-bbs-utilities/

    Marisa
    --- https://SynchronetBBS.org/HostSplash - SBBS hosting for $14/month
    þ Synchronet þ Amiga City - The BBS for the Amiga - more than 3,500+ files
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Digital Man on Thursday, January 30, 2020 18:50:49
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 03:38 pm

    2 random questions, 2 random answers:

    Likely, the Big Bang.

    I usually prefer chicken.

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #19:
    The first Synchronet BBS (Vertrauen) went live in July of 1991 (replacing WWIV).
    Norco, CA WX: 72.7øF, 15.0% humidity, 6 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs


    LOL! :-P

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Gamgee@VERT/PALANT to The Millionaire on Thursday, January 30, 2020 20:39:00
    The Millionaire wrote to echicken <=-

    Yes because when Linus Torvaus(sp?) started developing Linux back
    in the mid 90's, he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS
    kernel and decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which
    became a Linux kernel and built a windows GUI around it which
    became Linux. He also believed that the OS and its software shall
    always be free and be based on an open source community similar
    to Synchronet. By the way Linux was named after his name Linus
    since he started it all and has boomed over the years in a huge
    way. A lot of businesses rely on Linux as well.

    The only accurate statement in that mess is the very last
    sentence.



    ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Nightfox on Friday, January 31, 2020 05:17:57
    Your message seems to be
    wrapped to a fairly narrow
    console width, around
    30-something characters..

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Tracker1 on Thursday, January 30, 2020 21:51:17
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Nightfox on Fri Jan 31 2020 05:17 am

    Your message seems to be
    wrapped to a fairly narrow
    console width, around
    30-something characters..

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    ecWeb or the old legacy/runemaster web UI? Whatever it is, its doing something unexpected with line-wrapping.

    digital man

    Synchronet "Real Fact" #57:
    Synchronet introduced Telnet, FTP, SMTP and POP3 support w/v3.00a-Win32 in 2000.
    Norco, CA WX: 62.4øF, 27.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Rampage@VERT/SESTAR to Tracker1 on Friday, January 31, 2020 07:51:07
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Nightfox on Fri Jan 31 2020 05:17:57

    Your message seems to be
    wrapped to a fairly narrow
    console width, around
    30-something characters..

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    i think the key factor you're leaving out is that you're writing from a mobile device with a narrow screen width...

    /me wonders what happens if you rotate your device so that it is in landscape mode instead of portrait mode...


    )\/(ark

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Rampage on Friday, January 31, 2020 10:31:08
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Rampage to Tracker1 on Fri Jan 31 2020 07:51 am

    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Nightfox on Fri Jan 31 2020 05:17:57

    Your message seems to be
    wrapped to a fairly narrow
    console width, around
    30-something characters..

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    i think the key factor you're leaving out is that you're writing from a mobile device with a narrow screen width...

    Ideally, the message should still be created with flowed text (long-line paragraphs).

    /me wonders what happens if you rotate your device so that it is in landscape mode instead of portrait mode...

    It's not an ideal "fix". Ideally, we can all use different screen dimensions and our messages are all very readable and quotable.

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #15:
    Review on "Shark Sandwich", merely a two word review: "Shit Sandwich".
    Norco, CA WX: 73.2øF, 23.0% humidity, 3 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From DaiTengu@VERT/ENSEMBLE to The Millionaire on Friday, January 31, 2020 12:32:51
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:31 am

    Yes because when Linus Torvaus(sp?) started developing Linux back in the

    Linus Torvalds

    mid 90's,
    Early 90's. 1991 to be precise.

    he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and
    decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a Linux kernel and built a windows GUI around it which became Linux.

    What? this isn't even remotely true. It was based off Minix. Linus has/had
    nothing to do with X11 or XFree86/X.Org Quit making shit up.

    He also
    believed that the OS and its software shall always be free and be based on an open source community similar to Synchronet.

    He release it under the GPL after seeing a speech/presentation by Richard Stallman. (Stallman being a giant piece if shit is a discussion for another thread) He had NO plans on Linux being as big as it is today. His first post about it literally said "I'm doing a operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gno) for 386(486) AT clones."


    By the way Linux was named
    after his name Linus since he started it all and has boomed over the years in a huge way.

    Somewhat correct. It was mash of "Linus" and "Minix"

    A lot of businesses rely on Linux as well.

    indeed. It is literally my job to manage Linux servers.

    DaiTengu

    ... Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Digital Man on Friday, January 31, 2020 12:52:31
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Thu Jan 30 2020 09:51 pm

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    ecWeb or the old legacy/runemaster web UI? Whatever it is, its doing something unexpected with line-wrapping.

    The Runemaster interface would do that for me when I used to use it. I think it had something to do with the width of the text box used for message input.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to DaiTengu on Friday, January 31, 2020 12:59:26
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: DaiTengu to The Millionaire on Fri Jan 31 2020 12:32 pm

    he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and
    decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a
    Linux kernel and built a windows GUI around it which became Linux.

    What? this isn't even remotely true. It was based off Minix. Linus has/had nothing to do with X11 or XFree86/X.Org Quit making shit up.

    Yeahhh... If he could go ahead and stop saying things that are untrue, that would be great..
    https://www.austinchronicle.com/binary/9ef6/screens_feature3-1.jpg

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Nightfox on Friday, January 31, 2020 13:26:28
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Fri Jan 31 2020 12:52 pm

    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Thu Jan 30 2020 09:51 pm

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    ecWeb or the old legacy/runemaster web UI? Whatever it is, its doing something unexpected with line-wrapping.

    The Runemaster interface would do that for me when I used to use it. I think it had something to do with the width of the text box used for message input.

    I'm pretty sure the old runemaster Web UI uses a fixed 80-column input for message text. I suppose it may be that the entire input box wasn't visible so author of the message hit enter around column 40 to keep all the text visible in his window into the message input box. That's just a theory though.

    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #38:
    Artie Fufkin: I'm not asking, I'm telling with this. Kick my ass.
    Norco, CA WX: 77.9øF, 17.0% humidity, 8 mph W wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From HusTler@VERT/HAVENS to Nightfox on Friday, January 31, 2020 22:02:14
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to DaiTengu on Fri Jan 31 2020 12:59 pm

    he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and
    decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a
    Linux kernel and built a windows GUI around it which became Linux.

    What? this isn't even remotely true. It was based off Minix. Linus has/had nothing to do with X11 or XFree86/X.Org Quit making shit up.

    Yeahhh... If he could go ahead and stop saying things that are untrue, that would be great..

    Who invited this guy TM back to the network?

    HusTler@ havens.synchro.net

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Havens BBS havens.synchro.net
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to HusTler on Friday, January 31, 2020 19:51:58
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Nightfox to DaiTengu on Fri Jan 31 2020 12:59 pm

    Who invited this guy TM back to the network?

    HusTler@ havens.synchro.net

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Havens BBS havens.synchro.net


    "I'll be back!" - Arnold Schwarzenegger (The Terminator) 1984

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to The Millionaire on Sunday, February 02, 2020 14:07:53
    Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: The Millionaire to echicken on Thu Jan 30 2020 06:31 am

    Yes because when Linus Torvaus(sp?) started developing Linux back in the mid 90's, he didn't like the way Microsoft wrote the DOS kernel and decided to rewrite his own version himself of it which became a Linux

    Maybe he was worried about other companies hogging DOS, and then he went on to start an ice cream company.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Digital Man on Monday, February 03, 2020 08:10:06
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Thu Jan 30 2020 21:51:17

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    ecWeb or the old legacy/runemaster web UI? Whatever it is, its doing something unexpected with line-wrapping.

    It's the old legacy web ui... I'm using the browser on my phone, not a great experience, but can go through messages watching TV... it's on my personal TODO to re-create the web ui/ux in a more scalable UX.

    May get ecWeb running, and see how that does... should be a better experience.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Tracker1 on Monday, February 03, 2020 10:58:37
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Digital Man on Mon Feb 03 2020 08:10 am

    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Thu Jan 30 2020 21:51:17

    I'm using the stock synchronet
    web editor on my phone for some
    messages.

    ecWeb or the old legacy/runemaster web UI? Whatever it is, its doing something unexpected with line-wrapping.

    It's the old legacy web ui... I'm using the browser on my phone, not a great experience, but can go through messages watching TV... it's on my personal TODO to re-create the web ui/ux in a more scalable UX.

    May get ecWeb running, and see how that does... should be a better experience.

    Yeah, if you can't fit the entire 80x25 edit window in your browser, then ecWeb would be a much better experience. Heck, ecWeb is better for most uses.

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #18:
    DM = Digital Man (Rob Swindell) or Dungeon Master
    Norco, CA WX: 52.9øF, 16.0% humidity, 4 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Digital Man on Wednesday, February 05, 2020 04:47:41
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Mon Feb 03 2020 10:58:37

    Yeah, if you can't fit the entire 80x25 edit window in your browser, then ecWeb would be a much better
    experience. Heck, ecWeb is better for most uses.

    Funny enough, I can't seem to login from my phone using ecweb... not sure how it works... for now, using a desktop with local connection over ssh tunnel.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Tracker1 on Tuesday, February 04, 2020 21:41:47
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Tracker1 to Digital Man on Wed Feb 05 2020 04:47 am

    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Mon Feb 03 2020 10:58:37

    Yeah, if you can't fit the entire 80x25 edit window in your browser, then ecWeb would be a much better
    experience. Heck, ecWeb is better for most uses.

    Funny enough, I can't seem to login from my phone using ecweb... not sure how it works... for now, using a desktop with local connection over ssh tunnel.

    Which version of ecWeb? Works for me w/ecwebv4 at web.synchro.net. There's a "Log in" option in the upper-right drop-down (hamburger) menu.

    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #73:
    TCP = Transmission Control Protocol
    Norco, CA WX: 48.9øF, 13.0% humidity, 4 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Digital Man on Sunday, February 09, 2020 03:57:36
    Re: Re: Synchronet Control Panel
    By: Digital Man to Tracker1 on Tue Feb 04 2020 21:41:47

    Funny enough, I can't seem to login from my phone using ecweb... not
    sure how it works... for now, using a desktop with local connection
    over ssh tunnel.

    Which version of ecWeb? Works for me w/ecwebv4 at web.synchro.net. There's
    a "Log in" option in the upper-right drop-down (hamburger) menu.

    Latest from github... tbh, don't really like the UX... after I get the telnet setup working the way I like again, will probably try to replicated the message at a time (newscan) type interface, or a three pane reader resembling email/nntp.

    Mainly wanting to try to reuse some of the web services ec wrote if I can.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    +o roughneckbbs.com
    bbs@tracker1.dev

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Daryl Stout@VERT to THE MILLIONAIRE on Thursday, January 30, 2020 20:57:00
    Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

    <tongue in cheek> Colonel Sanders. <G>

    Daryl


    * OLX 1.53 * You'll win the lottery, & spend the winnings on The Sysop
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net (1:19/33)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Daryl Stout@VERT to DIGITAL MAN on Thursday, January 30, 2020 20:58:00
    Rob,

    The chicken or the egg?

    I usually prefer chicken.

    Both...nuggets and eggs. Then, let's add things like biscuits, gravy, tomatoes, ham, bacon, sausage, pork chops, etc.

    As Janis Kracht notes "Even Sysops have to eat". <G>

    Daryl


    * OLX 1.53 * Z-Modem: A modem that has been given a tranquilizer.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net (1:19/33)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Daryl Stout@VERT to NIGHTFOX on Tuesday, February 04, 2020 22:52:00
    Maybe he was worried about other companies hogging DOS, and then he went on t N>start an ice cream company.

    Windows Ice Cream: Hoggin' DOS. <G>

    Daryl


    * OLX 1.53 * Beauty is skin deep...but ugly goes clear to the bone.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net (1:19/33)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Daryl Stout on Tuesday, February 11, 2020 14:59:06
    Windows Ice Cream: Hoggin' DOS. <G>

    Daryl

    * OLX 1.53 * Beauty is skin deep...but ugly goes clear to the bone.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net (1:19/33)


    Microsluts: Midget Robotic Prostitutes. :-P

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Daryl Stout@VERT to THE MILLIONAIRE on Wednesday, February 12, 2020 20:59:00
    Microsluts: Midget Robotic Prostitutes. :-P

    Even they need love, too. <G>

    Daryl


    * OLX 1.53 * If you hear an Onion Ring, please answer it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: The Thunderbolt BBS - tbolt.synchro.net (1:19/33)
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Alter Ego on Tuesday, February 18, 2020 22:47:07
    On 1/30/20 1:18 AM, Alter Ego wrote:
    In Windows it's Hyper-V, in Mac
    they have something similar.

    Nope, Hyper-V is virtual machines, which is not docker containers.

    Docker Desktop for Windows does emphatically *USE* Hyper-V, it's a Linux Virtual environment, where the actual containers run... similar for MacOS.

    I develop very heavy database I/O on MAC desktops and it works well.
    Not fast, I agree, but good enough for development.

    Again, using a volume mount to the host OS in mac and windows is
    significantly slower, if it performs good enough for you, great.


    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Digital Man on Tuesday, February 18, 2020 22:50:55
    On 1/31/20 2:26 PM, Digital Man wrote:
    I'm pretty sure the old runemaster Web UI uses a fixed 80-column
    input for message text. I suppose it may be that the entire input box
    wasn't visible so author of the message hit enter around column 40 to
    keep all the text visible in his window into the message input box.
    That's just a theory though.

    If you use it with a phone, you'll see what I was doing... was
    definitely NOT manually word wrapping at 20 something characters.


    --
    Michael J. Ryan
    tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20